Over the past five decades, audiovisual content distribution services have evolved in many ways. In the 1970s, free-to-air TV was the main platform for content distribution and thereafter technological evolution allowed pay TV to go mainstream. However, it was not until the past decade that such providers started facing additional competition from a variety of sources and within a quite short time span.
Suddenly, higher broadband adoption and technical capabilities in both provision and consumption has allowed the internet to become an audiovisual content distribution platform that, given its nature, has introduced a great variety of relevant actors to the industry.
By banishing barriers to entry, the internet has made it possible for single users and companies alike to massively distribute audiovisual content at a very low cost. What started out as a new and clearly differentiated set of audiovisual content has rapidly morphed into first a complement and now a substitute to traditional content distribution platforms, as in the so-called ‘cord-cutting’ and ‘cord-shaving’ phenomena.
Additional competition is always a good thing - more diverse content from different sources means fulfilling previously unsatisfied consumer needs while making other providers offer innovative products and services. However, such a way to compete is inherently flawed if, as now is the case, the playing field is unbalanced or tilted towards one side, thus benefiting a set of players over the others.
Such unbalance comes from three main factors. First, traditional pay TV operators face a set of regulations concerning content distribution such as must-carry obligations that are currently not applicable to over the top (OTT) services and make the provision of their services costlier in many cases. Second, pay TV operators face, in many jurisdictions, special taxes and duty schemes which OTT services are not subject to – and even more dramatic is the fact that in most countries OTT services operated from abroad do not have to pay a single penny in taxes. The third factor comes from technological convergence, given that many pay TV operators are now broadband providers as well and must deal with the consequences of increased traffic coming from growing adoption of OTT services among their subscribers.
Traditional audiovisual providers are increasingly concerned about the lack of a level playing field. Grupo Televisa's JAVIER TEJADO-DONDÉ gives his view.
We give innovators and regulators a forum in which to explore, debate and agree the best policies and regulatory frameworks for widest societal benefit.
Insight: Exchange: Influence
We give members a voice through conferences, symposiums and private meetings, as well as broad exposure of their differing viewpoints through articles, reports and interviews.
The new website will make it easier for you to gather fresh insights, exchange views with others and have a voice in the debateTake a look Learn more about our updates
You are seeing this because you are using a browser that is not supported. The International Institute of Communications website is built using modern technology and standards. We recommend upgrading your browser with one of the following to properly view our website:Windows
Please note that this is not an exhaustive list of browsers. We also do not intend to recommend a particular manufacturer's browser over another's; only to suggest upgrading to a browser version that is compliant with current standards to give you the best and most secure browsing experience.