NEW IIC Podcasts – see more

INTERMEDIA

FACILITATION VS REGULATION

19.11.2019
Share this

“Industrial policies – meaning policies by which governments attempt to shape sectoral allocation of the economy are back in fashion.” So said Nobel prize winning economist, Joseph Stiglitz and colleagues, in 2013.1 The quote highlights that there are two approaches to ICT policy – regulatory and developmental. In telecoms, the objective of a regulatory approach to policy is to create a stable policy framework for a liberalised telecoms market with real competition. The instruments are rulemaking and correction of market failures. The argument is that a stable regulatory environment reduces transaction costs and stimulates investments But direct market interventions are to be avoided.

In contrast, the developmental approach stimulates investments and the use of technology through various public sector activities. The instruments could be demand stimulation via public consumption or subsidies to use or supply ICT services. This includes direct market intervention, such as in public-private partnerships that give public support to infrastructure development.

So a country that is a developmental ‘state’ contrasts with the regulatory state, where the state is mainly concerned with creating a framework for economic competition, but not with direct intervention in substantive matters. Japan has been mainly a developmental state (while the US is mainly a regulatory state). Chalmers Johnson claims that state intervention in Japan and especially the role of the ministry of trade and industry (MITI) played an instrumental role in the successful economic development of the country, and that other East Asian countries (Hong Kong, Taiwan, Korea and China) have each developed their own versions of the developmental state.

Should governments be putting more emphasis on industrial policy and developmental approaches in ICT, ask Morten Falch and Anders Henten.

Intermedia Issue:
Vol 43, Issue 3
Issue Date:
September 2015
Theme:
Competition Policy

Vol 43, Issue 3 Features

EDITORIAL 19.11.2019
ECONOMIC CATALYST 19.11.2019
Q&A WITH WILLHELM ESCHWEILER 19.11.2019
View All
Back to the top

The IIC is the world's only policy debating platform for the converged communications industry

We give innovators and regulators a forum in which to explore, debate and agree the best policies and regulatory frameworks for widest societal benefit.

Insight: Exchange: Influence

We give members a voice through conferences, symposiums and private meetings, as well as broad exposure of their differing viewpoints through articles, reports and interviews.

The new website will make it easier for you to gather fresh insights, exchange views with others and have a voice in the debate

Take a look Learn more about our updates
Please upgrade your browser

You are seeing this because you are using a browser that is not supported. The International Institute of Communications website is built using modern technology and standards. We recommend upgrading your browser with one of the following to properly view our website:

Windows Mac

Please note that this is not an exhaustive list of browsers. We also do not intend to recommend a particular manufacturer's browser over another's; only to suggest upgrading to a browser version that is compliant with current standards to give you the best and most secure browsing experience.